Skip to main content

Surrendering curation and promotion

Facebook, Linkedin, Google, Apple and Amazon have very little ability to promote a specific idea or creator.

That sounds crazy, but culturally and technically, it’s true.

In 1995, Oprah got to put just one person as the lead in an episode of her show. That choice was a commitment and a signal. It said to her viewers, “there were many people who could have been on the show today, but I chose this person.”

In 2000, Random House got to pick one book to be their big business title for November. Just one. Their curation sent a message to bookstores, who stocked more copies as a result.

They were curators and their curation led to promotion and attention. There was a cost to picking junk, and a benefit to earning trust.

The tech giants have surrendered that ability, with the costs and benefits that come with it. They end up disrespecting creations and their creators.

It doesn’t matter if you know someone at Google or if Amazon promises that they’re going to heavily promote your new Kindle book. The people who work at these companies don’t have a dial to turn. Amazon is good at selling everything, but they’re terrible at selling a thing.

Apple gets some zing for a recommended podcast now and then, or for a heavily promoted record, but the same rule is generally true with them–98% of all their content is driven by the algorithm, not a human with something at stake. They don’t care which record you pay for, as long as you pay for something.

The platforms are built on the idea that the audience plus the algorithm do all the deciding. No curation, no real promotion, simply the system, grinding away.

This inevitably leads to pandering, a race to the bottom.

Netflix is an exception because they have so much at stake in the investment of their own products that they insist on curating and promoting, bending the algorithm in the direction they wish it to go.

When a site tries to do both (like Buzzfeed), it’s a perilous journey. The metrics and the algorithm will swallow up the best intent of taste and culture making.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Protesters stormed the US embassy in Baghdad and torched parts of it on New Year's Eve

AHMAD AL-RUBAYE/AFP via Getty Images Protesters have stormed the US embassy in Baghdad, setting fire to a reception area. The demonstrations were sparked by US attacks on a militia in Iraq and Syria Sunday, in which 25 were killed. President Trump in a tweet accused Iran of being behind the attack on the embassy, and said the US had launched the strikes in retaliation for an attack in which a US contractor was killed.  Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories . Supporters of Shia militias in Iraq have stormed the US embassy in Baghdad, setting fire to a guard tower and reception area, according to reports.  An Associated Press reporter at the scene reported seeing flames rise from inside the compound, and at least three US soldiers on its roof. See the rest of the story at Business Insider NOW WATCH: How Ocean Spray cranberries go from the bog to your Thanksgiving table See Also: Greta Thunberg will interview David Attenborough in a special edition of the BB...
Post a Comment
Read more

The future of flying? AI that shames you into being a better passenger

The AI-powered airport of the future is full of promise–and peril, writes Teague futurist Devin Liddell. The first biometric airport terminal is already up and running, thanks to Delta’s collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Transportation Security Administration, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Similar systems are now operational at Dubai International Airport , at least for first- and business-class passengers. While groundbreaking, these systems—powered by artificial intelligence—are early exemplars of the emerging technological transformation of airport and airline operations. They are working preludes to artificial intelligence’s eventual forays throughout the passenger experience. Part of these forays will be driven by technology; we’ll have increasingly smarter and capable tools for independently managing enormous complexities and creating new efficiencies. Another part will be driven by new c...
Post a Comment
Read more

The market's favorite recession indicator has stopped flashing red. But the Duke professor who created it told us everyone should still be prepared for the worst.

Screengrab/YouTube Campbell Harvey, the Duke University professor who uncovered the inverted yield curve as a recession indicator, says his model could some day give a false positive signal. It's something that's top of mind right now, as the curve has univerted in recent weeks. But Campbell argues his model isn't broken or flashing a false signal because the same conditions from prior economic downturns are also present now. He says that everyone should heed the indicator's latest warning as there are other signs that a downturn is coming.  Read more on Business Insider. Campbell Harvey, the Duke professor who pioneered the inverted yield curve's use as a recession signal, says his beloved model will break one day. "I'm not naive about this — the model is very simple," Harvey, who is now a professor at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, told Markets Insider in an interview. "There will be false signals."  See the rest ...
Post a Comment
Read more